#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE WINDOWS 10#
#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE CODE#
#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE LICENSE#
#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE DOWNLOAD#

#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE CODE#

Of course, once the code went open source around 2000, people were free to create derivative projects and they did.

#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE WINDOWS 10#

They gave responsibility over to the Apache Software Foundation.ДЄpparently, though, StarOffice 5.1 will still run on Windows 10 as demonstrates in the following video: In 2011, Oracle decided to kill the commercial offering, leaving OpenOffice, the official community-based keeper for the StarOffice flame. For example, StarOffice 9 was no longer free for educational customers, but they could use StarOffice 8 or, of course, just stick with OpenOffice and forego support. They also did strange things with licensing. They renamed the program Oracle Open Office. They didnвЂ™t seem to have much of a plan for some of the things they bought and StarOffice was one of them. A couple of years later, StarOffice 8/OpenOffice 2.0 appeared and by 2008, we had StarOffice 9 with OpenOffice 3.0 just before Oracle entered the picture. In 2003, release 1.1 turned into StarOffice 7. StarOffice 6.0 corresponded to OpenOffice 1.0. This was the state of affairs for a while. Sun contributed to the project and would periodically snapshot the code to market future versions of StarOffice.

#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE LICENSE#

It eventually released much of the code under an open source license producing OpenOffice.

#APACHE OPENOFFICE VS LIBREOFFICE VS MICROSOFT OFFICE DOWNLOAD#

Sun provided StarOffice 5.2 in 2000 as a free download for personal use, which gave the software a lot of attention. The story was that it was still cheaper than buying a license for each Sun employee, particularly since most had both a Windows machine and a Unix machine which still required some capability. We donвЂ™t mean they bought a copy or a license, they bought the entire thing for just under $74 million. The program was far less expensive than most competitors, costing about $70, yet in 1999 that price point prompted Sun Microsystems to buy StarOffice. Eventually, the company added other office suite programs and with support for DOS, OS/2, and Windows, the suite became known as StarOffice.

By 1986, he created a company, Star Division, porting the word processor to platforms like CP/M and MSDOS. It all started when German Marco BГ¶rries wrote StarWriter in 1985 for the Zilog Z80. But it did get us thinking about how things got here. We could argue that case either way, but we wonвЂ™t. LibreOffice, on the other hand, is a very active project. Their logic is that OpenOffice has huge name recognition, but hasnвЂ™t had a new major release in several years. However, the LibreOffice team recently penned an open letter to the Apache project - the current keepers of OpenOffice - asking them to redirect new users to the LibreOffice project. That isnвЂ™t surprising since they both started with exactly the same code base. Thus, some 'rich' documents that provides additional features supported with a particular macro will not run in the other suite.When it comes to open source office suites, most people choose OpenOffice or LibreOffice, and they both look suspiciously similar. Calc is very similar to older Excel XP edition.ДЄ final warning: Star Basic (the language of the macros running by LO and AOO) is different from VBA which is the MS Basic variation. Whatever concerns Calc, the spreadsheet offered by LO and AOO, the compatibility is great. However, consider that even in that case, some slight differences may appear in very complex layouts, but without loss of information. doc format, you may use without fear both suites to read and write in that format. On the other hand both LO and AOO has great compatibility with older.

docx format (offered by LO) has some problems when saving images (sometimes they just disappear) and in general should be avoided. More details: Be aware that although both LibreOffice (LO) and Apache OpenOffice (AOO) is capable of reading all MS formats, the exportation of native. A short answer: For most of the cases you will be satisfied from the compatibility of LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice (which are same) with MS Office.

Apache openoffice vs libreoffice vs microsoft office